Skip to main content

Server-Side Rendering (SSR): When to Use and When Not to Use

What is Server-Side Rendering?​

Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is a technique where web pages are rendered on the server before being sent to the client's browser, as opposed to Client-Side Rendering (CSR) where the browser handles the rendering using JavaScript.

When to Use Server-Side Rendering​

1. SEO Requirements​

  • Search Engine Optimization: When your application needs to be crawled and indexed by search engines
  • Social Media Sharing: When you need proper meta tags for social media previews (Open Graph, Twitter Cards)
  • Content Discoverability: When your content needs to be discoverable through search

2. Performance for Initial Page Load​

  • Faster First Contentful Paint: Users see content immediately without waiting for JavaScript to load
  • Reduced Time to Interactive: Critical content is available before JavaScript hydration
  • Slower Network Conditions: Better performance on slow connections or mobile networks

3. Content-Heavy Applications​

  • Blogs and News Sites: Static content that benefits from immediate visibility
  • E-commerce Product Pages: Product information needs to be immediately available
  • Marketing Landing Pages: Critical content must load quickly for conversions

4. Accessibility Requirements​

  • Screen Reader Compatibility: Content is available immediately without JavaScript dependencies
  • Progressive Enhancement: Basic functionality works even if JavaScript fails to load

5. Caching Benefits​

  • CDN Caching: Rendered HTML can be cached at edge locations
  • Server-Side Caching: Expensive computations can be cached on the server
  • Reduced API Calls: Data can be fetched once on the server instead of multiple client requests

When NOT to Use Server-Side Rendering​

1. Highly Interactive Applications​

  • Real-time Applications: Chat applications, live dashboards, collaborative tools
  • Complex User Interactions: Applications with frequent state changes
  • Client-Side Rich Interfaces: Applications requiring immediate user feedback

2. Server Resource Constraints​

  • High Traffic Applications: SSR requires more server CPU and memory
  • Limited Server Capacity: When scaling server infrastructure is expensive
  • Cost Considerations: Higher server costs compared to static hosting

3. Personalized Content​

  • User-Specific Data: Content that varies significantly per user
  • Authentication-Heavy Apps: Where most content is behind authentication
  • Dynamic User Preferences: Applications with heavy personalization

4. Development Complexity​

  • Simple SPAs: When application complexity doesn't justify SSR overhead
  • Rapid Prototyping: When development speed is prioritized over performance
  • Limited Team Experience: When team lacks SSR expertise

5. Client-Side Data Requirements​

  • Browser APIs: When application heavily relies on browser-specific APIs
  • Client-Side Storage: Applications that primarily use localStorage, sessionStorage
  • Offline Functionality: Apps that need to work without server connection

Hybrid Approaches​

Static Site Generation (SSG)​

  • Pre-render pages at build time
  • Best for content that doesn't change frequently
  • Combines benefits of SSR and static hosting

Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR)​

  • Update static pages on-demand
  • Balance between static performance and dynamic content
  • Good for content that changes occasionally

Selective SSR​

  • Render critical pages with SSR
  • Use CSR for interactive sections
  • Implement based on route or component level

Technical Considerations​

Performance Metrics to Monitor​

  • Time to First Byte (TTFB): Server response time
  • First Contentful Paint (FCP): When content appears
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP): When main content loads
  • Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS): Visual stability

Caching Strategies​

  • Full Page Caching: Cache entire rendered HTML
  • Fragment Caching: Cache reusable components
  • Data Layer Caching: Cache API responses server-side

Hydration Considerations​

  • Bundle Size: JavaScript still needs to download for interactivity
  • Hydration Mismatches: Server and client rendering must match
  • Progressive Hydration: Load interactive components incrementally

JavaScript/Node.js​

  • Next.js: Full-stack React framework with SSR/SSG
  • Nuxt.js: Vue.js framework with SSR capabilities
  • Remix: React framework focused on web standards
  • SvelteKit: Svelte framework with SSR support

Other Languages​

  • Django/Flask: Python web frameworks with server-side templating
  • Ruby on Rails: Full-stack framework with server-side rendering
  • Laravel: PHP framework with Blade templating
  • ASP.NET: Microsoft framework with Razor pages

Best Practices​

1. Optimize Server Performance​

  • Use efficient caching strategies
  • Implement proper load balancing
  • Monitor server resource usage

2. Minimize JavaScript Bundle Size​

  • Code splitting for non-critical features
  • Tree shaking to remove unused code
  • Lazy loading for below-the-fold content

3. Implement Proper Error Handling​

  • Graceful fallbacks for server errors
  • Client-side error boundaries
  • Proper logging and monitoring

4. Consider Progressive Enhancement​

  • Ensure basic functionality without JavaScript
  • Layer interactive features on top
  • Provide meaningful loading states

Conclusion​

The decision to use Server-Side Rendering should be based on your specific requirements:

  • Choose SSR when you need SEO, fast initial page loads, or have content-heavy applications
  • Avoid SSR for highly interactive apps, when server resources are limited, or for simple SPAs
  • Consider hybrid approaches like SSG or selective SSR for the best of both worlds

The key is to match your rendering strategy to your application's needs, user expectations, and technical constraints.